Eficacia y seguridad de oxihidróxido sucroférrico en el tratamiento de la hiperfosforemia en la enfermedad renal crónica. Estudio FOSFASTUR / Efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in chronic kidney disease. FOSFASTUR study

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las alteraciones del metabolismo óseo y mineral son muy frecuentes en la enfermedad renal crónica (ERC). El aumento en los niveles de fósforo condiciona enfermedad ósea, riego de calcificación y mayor mortalidad, por lo que cualquier estrategia encaminada a su reducción debe ser bienvenida. El último fármaco incorporado al arsenal terapéutico para tratar la hiperfosforemia en la ERC es el oxihidróxido sucroférrico (OSF). OBJETIVO: Analizar la eficacia y seguridad de OSF en 3 cohortes de pacientes, una con ERC avanzada no en diálisis, otra en diálisis peritoneal y finalmente otra en hemodiálisis, seguidas durante 6 meses. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional multicéntrico, prospectivo, de práctica clínica. Se analizaron variables clínicas y epidemiológicas. Se valoró la evolución de parámetros relacionados con las alteraciones del metabolismo óseo y mineral y la anemia. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron en el estudio 85 pacientes (62 ± 12 años, 64% varones, 34% diabéticos), 25 con ERC avanzada no en diálisis, 25 en diálisis peritoneal y finalmente 35 en hemodiálisis. En 66 pacientes (78%) OSF fue el primer captor del fósforo; en los otros 19 se sustituyó un captor previo por OSF, por falta de tolerancia o eficacia. La dosis inicial de OSF fue 964 ± 323 mg/día. Globalmente los niveles séricos de fósforo experimentaron un descenso significativo a los 3 meses de tratamiento (19,6%; p < 0,001). No hubo diferencias en la eficacia del fármaco al comparar las distintas poblaciones analizadas. A lo largo del estudio no se modificaron los niveles de calcio, PTHi, ferritina, índice de saturación de la transferrina ni hemoglobina, aunque se manifestó una tendencia al aumento de los 2 últimos. Doce pacientes (14%) abandonaron el seguimiento, 10 por efectos adversos gastrointestinales (diarrea fundamentalmente) y 2 por pérdida de seguimiento (trasplante renal). La dosis media del fármaco que recibieron los pacientes se incrementó a lo largo del tiempo hasta alcanzar los 1.147 ± 371 mg/día. CONCLUSIONES: OSF es una opción eficaz para el tratamiento de la hiperfosforemia en pacientes con ERC tanto en fases avanzadas de la enfermedad como en diálisis. Encontramos una eficacia similar en los 3 grupos analizados. A mayor nivel basal de fósforo, mayor descenso de sus niveles séricos. Con dosis de alrededor de 1.000 g/día se puede conseguir un notable descenso de los niveles de fósforo. La diarrea fue el efecto secundario más frecuente, aunque tuvo poca importancia generalmente

INTRODUCTION: Alterations in bone and mineral metabolism are very common in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The increase in phosphate levels leads to bone disease, risk of calcification and greater mortality, so any strategy aimed at reducing them should be welcomed. The latest drug incorporated into the therapeutic arsenal to treat hyperphosphataemia in CKD is sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFO). OBJECTIVE: To analyse the efficacy and safety of SFO in 3 cohorts of patients, one with advanced CKD not on dialysis, another on peritoneal dialysis and the last on haemodialysis, followed for 6 months. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicentre study in clinical practice. Clinical and epidemiological variables were analysed. The evolution of parameters relating to alterations in bone and mineral metabolism and anaemia was analysed. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included in the study (62 ± 12 years, 64% male, 34% diabetic), 25 with advanced CKD not on dialysis, 25 on peritoneal dialysis and lastly, 35 on haemodialysis. In 66 patients (78%), SFO was the first phosphate binder; in the other 19, SFO replaced a previous phosphate binder due to poor tolerance or efficacy. The initial dose of SFO was 964 ± 323 mg/day. Overall, serum phosphate levels saw a significant reduction at 3 months of treatment (19.6%; P < .001). There were no differences in the efficacy of the drug when the different populations analysed were compared. Over the course of the study, there were no changes to levels of calcium, PTHi, ferritin, transferrin saturation index or haemoglobin, although there was a tendency for the last 2 to increase. Twelve patients (14%) withdrew from follow-up, 10 due to gastrointestinal adverse effects (primarily diarrhoea) and 2 were lost to follow-up (kidney transplant). The mean dose of the drug that the patients received increased over time, up to 1,147 ± 371 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: SFO is an effective option for the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in patients with CKD both in the advanced phases of the disease and on dialysis. We found similar efficacy across the 3 groups analysed. The higher their baseline phosphate level, the greater the reduction in the serum levels. A notable reduction in phosphate levels can be achieved with doses of around 1,000 mg/day. Diarrhoea was the most common side effect, although it generally was not significant

Efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in chronic kidney disease in Asturias. FOSFASTUR study.

Alterations in bone and mineral metabolism are very common in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The increase in phosphate levels leads to bone disease, risk of calcification and greater mortality, so any strategy aimed at reducing them should be welcomed. The latest drug incorporated into the therapeutic arsenal to treat hyperphosphataemia in CKD is Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide (SFO). OBJECTIVE: To analyse the efficacy and safety of OSF in three cohorts of patients, one with advanced chronic kidney disease not on dialysis (CKD-NoD), another on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and the last on haemodialysis (HD), followed for six months. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicentre study in clinical practice. Clinical and epidemiological variables were analysed. The evolution of parameters relating to alterations in bone and mineral metabolism and anaemia was analysed. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included in the study (62 ±â€¯12 years, 64% male, 34% diabetic), 25 with CKD-NoD, 25 on PD and lastly, 35 on HD. In 66 patients (78%), SFO was the first phosphate binder; in the other 19, SFO replaced a previous phosphate binder due to poor tolerance or efficacy. The initial dose of SFO was 964 ±â€¯323 mg/day. Overall, serum phosphate levels saw a significant reduction at three months of treatment (19.6%, P < 0.001). There were no differences in the efficacy of the drug when the different populations analysed were compared. Over the course of the study, there were no changes to levels of calcium, PTHi, ferritin, or the transferrin and haemoglobin saturation indices, although there was a tendency for the last two to increase. Twelve patients (14%) withdrew from follow-up, ten due to gastrointestinal adverse effects (primarily diarrhoea) and two were lost to follow-up (kidney transplant). The mean dose of the drug that the patients received increased over time, up to 1147 ±â€¯371 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: SFO is an effective option for the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in patients with CKD both in the advanced phases of the disease and on dialysis. We found similar efficacy across the three groups analysed. The higher their baseline phosphate level, the greater the reduction in the serum levels. A notable reduction in phosphate levels can be achieved with doses of around 1000 mg/day. Diarrhoea was the most common side effect, although it generally was not significant.

Risk factors associated with valvular calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease. Analysis of NEFRONA study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Subclinical cardiac structural alterations have prognostic value in these patients. The aim was to analyse the prevalence of valvular calcification, the evolution and the relationship with different risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Part of the sample of the NEFRONA study was randomly selected. Aortic and mitral valve calcification were analysed in echocardiograms performed at the baseline visit and at 24 months. RESULTS: We included 397 patients, the estimated basal glomerular filtrate (eGFR) was 33 ml/min with significant decrease to 30.9 ml/min. There was an increase in the area of carotid and femoral plaque, as well as an increase in patients with aortic and mitral calcification at 24 months. A positive association of mitral calcification at 24 months with age, ankle-brachial index (ABI) and calcium-phosphorus product (CaxP) at baseline visit was observed, without association with eGFR. Aortic calcification at 24 months was positively associated with age, phosphorous and total carotid plaque area at baseline, with no relationship to eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: A significant prevalence of valvular calcification was observed in patients with CKD without known cardiovascular disease.Two-year progression was observed independently of the eGFR. Patients with higher risk of mitral valve calcification were those with older age, higher ABI and CaxP product. Patients with a higher risk of aortic calcification were those with older age, higher phosphorous levels and larger area of carotid plaque. Identifying these higher risk patients would help to avoid future cardiovascular events intensifying follow-ups.

COVID-19 in transplant recipients: The Spanish experience.

We report the nationwide experience with solid organ transplant (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Spain until 13 July 2020. We compiled information for 778 (423 kidney, 113 HSCT, 110 liver, 69 heart, 54 lung, 8 pancreas, 1 multivisceral) recipients. Median age at diagnosis was 61 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 52-70), and 66% were male. The incidence of COVID-19 in SOT recipients was two-fold higher compared to the Spanish general population. The median interval from transplantation was 59 months (IQR: 18-131). Infection was hospital-acquired in 13% of cases. No donor-derived COVID-19 was suspected. Most patients (89%) were admitted to the hospital. Therapies included hydroxychloroquine (84%), azithromycin (53%), protease inhibitors (37%), and interferon-ß (5%), whereas immunomodulation was based on corticosteroids (41%) and tocilizumab (21%). Adjustment of immunosuppression was performed in 85% of patients. At the time of analysis, complete follow-up was available from 652 patients. Acute respiratory distress syndrome occurred in 35% of patients. Ultimately, 174 (27%) patients died. In univariate analysis, risk factors for death were lung transplantation (odds ratio [OR]: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.4-4.6), age >60 years (OR: 3.7; 95% CI: 2.5-5.5), and hospital-acquired COVID-19 (OR: 3.0; 95% CI: 1.9-4.9).

[Risk factors associated with valvular calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease. Analysis of NEFRONA Study]. / Factores de riesgo asociados a la calcificación valvular en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica. Análisis del Estudio Nefrona.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Subclinical cardiac structural alterations have prognostic value in these patients. The aim was to analyse the prevalence of valvular calcification, the evolution and the relationship with different risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Part of the sample of the NEFRONA study was randomly selected. Aortic and mitral valve calcification were analysed in echocardiograms performed at the baseline visit and at 24 months. RESULTS: We included 397 patients, the estimated basal glomerular filtrate (eGFR) was 33ml/min with significant decrease to 30.9ml/min. There was an increase in the area of carotid and femoral plaque, as well as an increase in patients with aortic and mitral calcification at 24 months. A positive association of mitral calcification at 24 months with age, ankle-brachial index (ABI) and calcium-phosphorus product (CaxP) at baseline visit was observed, without association with eGFR. Aortic calcification at 24 months was positively associated with age, phosphorous and total carotid plaque area at baseline, with no relationship to eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: A significant prevalence of valvular calcification was observed in patients with CKD without known cardiovascular disease.Two-year progression was observed independently of the eGFR. Patients with higher risk of mitral valve calcification were those with older age, higher ABI and CaxP product. Patients with a higher risk of aortic calcification were those with older age, higher phosphorous levels and larger area of carotid plaque. Identifying these higher risk patients would help to avoid future cardiovascular events intensifying follow-ups.

Efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in chronic kidney disease. FOSFASTUR study. / Eficacia y seguridad de oxihidróxido sucroférrico en el tratamiento de la hiperfosforemia en la enfermedad renal crónica. Estudio FOSFASTUR.

INTRODUCTION: Alterations in bone and mineral metabolism are very common in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The increase in phosphate levels leads to bone disease, risk of calcification and greater mortality, so any strategy aimed at reducing them should be welcomed. The latest drug incorporated into the therapeutic arsenal to treat hyperphosphataemia in CKD is sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFO). OBJECTIVE: To analyse the efficacy and safety of SFO in 3 cohorts of patients, one with advanced CKD not on dialysis, another on peritoneal dialysis and the last on haemodialysis, followed for 6 months. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicentre study in clinical practice. Clinical and epidemiological variables were analysed. The evolution of parameters relating to alterations in bone and mineral metabolism and anaemia was analysed. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included in the study (62±12 years, 64% male, 34% diabetic), 25 with advanced CKD not on dialysis, 25 on peritoneal dialysis and lastly, 35 on haemodialysis. In 66 patients (78%), SFO was the first phosphate binder; in the other 19, SFO replaced a previous phosphate binder due to poor tolerance or efficacy. The initial dose of SFO was 964±323mg/day. Overall, serum phosphate levels saw a significant reduction at 3 months of treatment (19.6%; P<.001). There were no differences in the efficacy of the drug when the different populations analysed were compared. Over the course of the study, there were no changes to levels of calcium, PTHi, ferritin, transferrin saturation index or haemoglobin, although there was a tendency for the last 2 to increase. Twelve patients (14%) withdrew from follow-up, 10 due to gastrointestinal adverse effects (primarily diarrhoea) and 2 were lost to follow-up (kidney transplant). The mean dose of the drug that the patients received increased over time, up to 1,147±371mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: SFO is an effective option for the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in patients with CKD both in the advanced phases of the disease and on dialysis. We found similar efficacy across the 3 groups analysed. The higher their baseline phosphate level, the greater the reduction in the serum levels. A notable reduction in phosphate levels can be achieved with doses of around 1,000mg/day. Diarrhoea was the most common side effect, although it generally was not significant.

Results from the ERA-EDTA Registry indicate a high mortality due to COVID-19 in dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients across Europe.

The aim of this study was to investigate 28-day mortality after COVID-19 diagnosis in the European kidney replacement therapy population. In addition, we determined the role of patient characteristics, treatment factors, and country on mortality risk with the use of ERA-EDTA Registry data on patients receiving kidney replacement therapy in Europe from February 1, 2020, to April 30, 2020. Additional data on all patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were collected from 7 European countries encompassing 4298 patients. COVID-19-attributable mortality was calculated using propensity score-matched historic control data and after 28 days of follow-up was 20.0% (95% confidence interval 18.7%-21.4%) in 3285 patients receiving dialysis and 19.9% (17.5%-22.5%) in 1013 recipients of a transplant. We identified differences in COVID-19 mortality across countries, and an increased mortality risk in older patients receiving kidney replacement therapy and male patients receiving dialysis. In recipients of kidney transplants ≥75 years of age, 44.3% (35.7%-53.9%) did not survive COVID-19. Mortality risk was 1.28 (1.02-1.60) times higher in transplant recipients compared with matched dialysis patients. Thus, the pandemic has had a substantial effect on mortality in patients receiving kidney replacement therapy, a highly vulnerable population due to underlying chronic kidney disease and a high prevalence of multimorbidity.

Situación de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes en tratamiento renal sustitutivo Informe del Registro COVID-19 de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología (S.E.N.) / SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients on renal replacement therapy. Report of the COVID-19 Registry of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (S.E.N.)

La reciente aparición de la pandemia por el coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 ha impactado de forma muy importante en la población general. Los pacientes en tratamiento renal sustitutivo (TRS) no han sido ajenos a esta situación y por sus características resultan especialmente vulnerables. Presentamos los resultados del análisis del Registro COVID-19 de la S.E.N. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: EL Registro comenzó a funcionar el 18 de marzo de 2020. Recoge variables epidemiológicas, datos del contagio y diagnóstico, clínica acompañante, tratamientos y desenlace. Se trata de un registro "on line". Los pacientes fueron diagnosticados de infección por SARS-Cov-2 en base a los resultados de la PCR del virus, realizada tanto en pacientes que habían manifestado clínica compatible o tenían signos sospechosos como en aquellos a los que se había hecho como cribado tras algún contacto conocido con otro enfermo. RESULTADOS: A fecha 11 de abril el Registro disponía de datos de 868 pacientes, procedentes de todas las Comunidades Autónomas. La modalidad de TRS más representada es la hemodiálisis en centro (HDC) seguida de los pacientes trasplantados. La clínica de presentación es similar a la población general. Un porcentaje muy elevado (85%) requirió ingreso hospitalario, un 8% en unidades de cuidados intensivos. Los tratamientos más utilizados fueron hidroxicloroquina, lopinavirritonavir y esteroides. La mortalidad es elevada y alcanza el 23%: los pacientes fallecidos estaban con más frecuencia en HDC, desarrollaban más frecuentemente neumonía y recibían en menos ocasiones lopinavir-ritonavir y esteroides. La edad y la neumonía se asociaban de forma independiente al riesgo de fallecer. CONCLUSIONES: La infección por SARS-CoV-2 afecta ya a un número importante de pacientes españoles en TRS, fundamentalmente aquellos que están en HDC, las tasas de hospitalización son muy elevadas y la mortalidad es elevada; la edad y el desarrollo de neumonía son factores asociados a mortalidad

The recent appearance of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on the general population. Patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) have not been unaware of this situation and due to their characteristics they are especially vulnerable. We present the results of the analysis of the COVID-19 Registry of the Spanish Society of Nephrology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Registry began operating on March 18th, 2020. It collects epidemiological variables, contagion and diagnosis data, signs and symptoms, treatments and outcomes. It is an "online" registry. Patients were diagnosed with SARS-Cov-2 infection based on the results of the PCR of the virus, carried out both in patients who had manifested compatible symptoms or had suspicious signs, as well as in those who had undergone screening after some contac, acquainted with another patient. RESULTS: As of April 11, the Registry had data on 868 patients, from all the Autonomous Communities. The most represented form of TRS is in-center hemodialysis (ICH) followed by transplant patients. Symptoms are similar to the general population. A very high percentage (85%) required hospital admission, 8% in intensive care units. The most used treatments were hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir-ritonavir, and steroids. Mortality is high and reaches 23%; deceased patients were more frequently on ICH, developed pneumonia more frequently, and received less frequently lopinavir-ritonavir and steroids. Age and pneumonia were independently associated with the risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection already affects a significant number of Spanish patients on RRT, mainly those on ICH, hospitalization rates are very high and mortality is high; age and the development of pneumonia are factors associated with mortality

[SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients on renal replacement therapy. Report of the COVID-19 Registry of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN)]. / Situación de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes en tratamiento renal sustitutivo. Informe del Registro COVID-19 de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología (SEN).

INTRODUCTION: The recent appearance of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on the general population. Patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) have not been unaware of this situation and due to their characteristics they are especially vulnerable. We present the results of the analysis of the COVID-19 Registry of the Spanish Society of Nephrology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Registry began operating on March 18th, 2020. It collects epidemiological variables, contagion and diagnosis data, signs and symptoms, treatments and outcomes. It is an online registry. Patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection based on the results of the PCR of the virus, carried out both in patients who had manifested compatible symptoms or had suspicious signs, as well as in those who had undergone screening after some contact acquainted with another patient. RESULTS: As of April 11, the Registry had data on 868 patients, from all the Autonomous Communities. The most represented form of RRT is in-center hemodialysis (ICH) followed by transplant patients. Symptoms are similar to the general population. A very high percentage (85%) required hospital admission, 8% in intensive care units. The most used treatments were hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir-ritonavir, and steroids. Mortality is high and reaches 23%; deceased patients were more frequently on ICH, developed pneumonia more frequently, and received less frequently lopinavir-ritonavir and steroids. Age and pneumonia were independently associated with the risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection already affects a significant number of Spanish patients on RRT, mainly those on ICH, hospitalization rates are very high and mortality is high; age and the development of pneumonia are factors associated with mortality.

Interacciones farmacológicas de los captores del fósforo / Pharmacological interactions of phosphate binders

No disponible

Una causa infrecuente de hemoperitoneo espontáneo en un paciente en diálisis peritoneal / An uncommon cause of spontaneous hemoperitoneum in a peritoneal dialysis patient

No disponible

Esclerosis peritoneal encapsulante: revisión de 3 casos / Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: A review of 3 cases

No disponible

Variaciones estacionales e influencia del clima en la aparición de la infección peritoneal / Seasonal Variations and Influence of the Weather on the Appearance of Peritoneal Infection

Introducción: La infección peritoneal es una complicación común en los pacientes en diálisis peritoneal (DP) y una causa frecuente de fallo de la técnica. Conocer los factores que predisponen a su aparición ayuda a establecer medidas preventivas. Objetivos: Conocer la influencia de variables climáticas en la aparición de peritonitis, como son las variaciones estacionales, la temperatura y la humedad en Asturias. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, de todas las infecciones peritoneales acaecidas en nuestra unidad de DP a lo largo de un período de 5 años (2007-2011). La región fue divida longitudinalmente en tres áreas: costa, medianías y cordillera, cada una de las cuales dispone de una estación climatológica de la Agencia Estatal de Meteorología (AEMET) de referencia (en Gijón, Oviedo y Mieres, respectivamente). La AEMET nos proporcionó los datos de humedad y temperatura media de los meses en los que se produjeron todas las peritonitis. Resultados: Se produjeron 171 peritonitis (0,498 episodios/paciente/año) en 201 pacientes (58 ± 16 años, 59 % varones, 33 % diabéticos, tiempo en técnica 20 ± 19 meses). No encontramos diferencias en función de la edad, el sexo, la condición de diabético, el ser portador nasal inicial de Staphylococcus aureus ni la modalidad terapéutica. Globalmente, no hubo diferencias en las distintas estaciones. Sin embargo, usando la primavera como referencia (valor 1), la tasa de incidencia de peritonitis por gramnegativos (95 % intervalo de confianza) en verano, otoño e invierno fue 0,666 (0,211-1,832), 0,248 (0,000-0,912) y 0,292 (0,000-0,833), respectivamente (P < 0,001). No constatamos dicha variación al analizar las tasas de incidencia de las peritonitis causadas por gérmenes grampositivos. La temperatura media los días en los que se produjeron infecciones peritoneales por gérmenes gramnegativos (15,46 ± 3,71 °C) es significativamente mayor que en los grampositivos (13,61 ± 3,89 °C) (P 0,022). No hay diferencias significativas en cuanto a la humedad (78,76 ± 4,40 frente a 77,5 ± 3,69 %) (P 0,227). Conclusiones: Globalmente, las tasas de infección peritoneal son semejantes en las cuatro estaciones del año, aunque en el caso de los gérmenes gramnegativos en primavera y verano se produce un aumento en su aparición. A mayor temperatura, mayor riesgo de que la infección peritoneal esté causada por un germen gramnegativo (AU)

Introduction: Peritoneal infections are a common complication in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) and are frequently the cause of the failure of the technique. Knowing the factors that can lead to their appearance helps to establish preventative measures. Aim: To understand the influence of climatic variables in the appearance of peritonitis, such as seasonal variation, the temperature and humidity in Asturias. Method: A retrospective, observational study of all peritoneal infections that occurred in our PD department over a period of 5 years (2007-2011). The region was divided lengthways into three areas: the coast, central area and mountains, each of which has a climatological season for reference, which is defined by the State Meteorology Agency (AEMET) (in Gijón, Oviedo and Mieres, respectively). The AEMET provided us with data on the humidity and average temperature of the months in which all the cases of peritonitis appeared. Results: There were 171 cases of peritonitis (0.498 episodes/patient/year) in 201 patients (58±16 years, 59% males, 33% diabetics, 20±19 months on technique). We did not find any differences according to age, sex, having diabetes, nasal carrier status for Staphylococcus aureus or therapeutic modality. Overall, there were no differences among seasons. However, using spring as a reference (value 1), the incidence rate of gram-negative peritonitis (95% confidence interval) in summer, autumn and winter was 0.666 (0.211-1.832), 0.248 (0.000-0.912) and 0.292 (0.000-0.833), respectively (P<.001). We do not see this variation upon analysing the incidence rates of peritonitis caused by gram-positive bacteria. The average temperature of the days on which peritoneal infections were caused by gram-negative bacteria (15.46±3.71°C) was significantly higher than on those days when it was caused by gram-positive bacteria (13.61±3.89 °C) (P.022). There are no significant differences in relation to humidity (78.76 ± 4.40 vs. 77.5±3.69 %) (P.227). Conclusions: Overall, the rates of peritoneal infection are similar in all four seasons of the year, although in the case of gram-negative bacteria there is an increase in its incidence in spring and summer. The higher the temperature, the higher the risk that a peritoneal infection will be the result of a gram-negative bacterium (AU)